小样本的高光谱图像降噪与分类
Hyperspectral image de-noising and classification with small training samples
- 2017年21卷第5期 页码:728-738
纸质出版日期: 2017-9 ,
录用日期: 2017-4-3
DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20176239
扫 描 看 全 文
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
纸质出版日期: 2017-9 ,
录用日期: 2017-4-3
扫 描 看 全 文
崔宾阁, 马秀丹, 谢小云. 2017. 小样本的高光谱图像降噪与分类. 遥感学报, 21(5): 728–738
Cui B G, Ma X D and Xie X Y. 2017. Hyperspectral image de-noising and classification with small training samples. Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(5): 728–738
在样本数目稀少情况下实现高光谱图像精细分类是个挑战性的问题。高光谱图像信噪比提高比较困难,噪声大小对分类结果有最直接的影响。利用高光谱图像相邻波段之间的相关性和相邻像素之间的相关性,提出多级降噪滤波的高光谱图像分类方法,通过改进的两阶段稀疏与低秩矩阵分解方法,去除高光谱图像中能量较高的噪声,利用主成分分析方法去除高光谱图像中能量较低的噪声,引导滤波方法去除分类结果图中的“椒盐噪声”。选取两幅真实高光谱图像进行实验,结果表明,两阶段稀疏与低秩矩阵分解法和主成分分析法两种降噪方法具有较强的互补性;引导滤波方法使得分类图更加平滑且分类精度更高。与其他光谱空间分类方法相比,本文方法分类精度更高,且在样本极少时能获得很高的分类精度。
The fine-grained classification of hyperspectral image with small training samples is a major challenge for all kinds of classifiers. The signal-to-noise ratio of hyperspectral image is usually difficult to improve
and the magnitude of noise has a direct impact on classification results. Thus
noise reduction is one of the most important pretreatment measures for hyperspectral image classification. Employing the strong relevance between adjacent bands of hyperspectral images and the relevance between adjacent pixels in the space
a novel hyperspectral image classification method based on multi-level denoising and filtering is proposed. One two-phase Sparse and Low Rank Matrix Decomposition (SLRMD) method is introduced to remove the noise with high energy. At the first phase
the hyperspectral image is segmented
and each patch will use the SLRMD method to perform noise reduction based on the spectral correlation between the pixels within the same patch. At the second phase
the pixels of all patches will be merged together for noise reduction based on the spectral correlation of the adjacent bands of the hyperspectral image. Secondly
then principal component analysis (PCA) is introduced to remove the noise with low energy. Thirdly
Support Vector Machine (SVM) is used to classify the de-noised and dimension reduced hyperspectral dataset. Finally
guided filter is introduced to remove the " salt and pepper noise” in the classification map. We use the Indian Pines hyperspectral dataset as an example to verify the noise reduction effect of sparse and low rank matrix decomposition methods. The effect of image noise reduction is very obvious
and the bands after noise reduction show very strong correlation. The pixel spectrum of the original image contains a lot of noise information
especially in the first few bands and the last few bands
whereas the pixel spectrum of the low rank image becomes very smooth. The Spectral and Spatial De-Correlation (SSDC) and Local Variance Estimation (LVE) methods were used to evaluate the change of image quality before and after noise reduction. The signal-to-noise ratio of hyperspectral images is significantly improved after low rank matrix decomposition
especially at both ends of the spectral range. Two hyperspectral images
i.e.
Indian Pines and University of Pavia
and some related classification methods are used for comparative experiments.The results show that the classification accuracy of our method is 25.85% and 13.2% higher than that of the SVM method
and 6.04% and 5.79% higher than the best method respectively. The two-phase SLRMD method proposed in this paper has better strong noise removal effect than the conventional SLRMD method
and it is more helpful to improve the classification accuracy of hyperspectral image. Moreover
SLRMD
principal component analysis and guided filtering
these three noise reduction and dimension reduction methods are highly complementary
so they should be used together to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of hyperspectral image and make the classification results more natural and smooth.
高光谱图像分类特征提取稀少样本稀疏与低秩矩阵分解
hyperspectral image classificationfeature extractionsmall training samplessparse and low rankmatrix decomposition
Beck A and Teboulle M. 2009. A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 2(1): 183–202
He K M, Sun J and Tang X O. 2010. Guided image filtering//Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Computer Vision. Heraklion, Crete: Springer: 1–14
Hughes G. 1968. On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 14(1): 55–63
Kang X D, Li S T and Benediktsson J A. 2014a. Spectral-spatial hyperspectral image classification with edge-preserving filtering. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(5): 2666–2677
Kang X D, Li S T and Benediktsson J A. 2014b. Feature extraction of hyperspectral images with image fusion and recursive filtering. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(6): 3742–3752
Lin Z C, Chen M M and Ma Y. 2009. The Augmented Lagrange Multiplier Method for Exact Recovery of Corrupted Low-Rank Matrices. Technical Report UILU-ENG-09-2215. arXiv: 1009.5055 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.10.010]
Liu X F, Bourennane S and Fossati C. 2012. Nonwhite noise reduction in hyperspectral images. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 9(3): 368–372
Lu X Q, Wang Y L and Yuan Y. 2013. Graph-regularized low-rank representation for destriping of hyperspectral images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51(7): 4009–4018
童庆禧, 张兵, 郑兰芬. 2006. 高光谱遥感——原理、技术与应用. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1–2
Tong Q X, Zhang B, Zheng L F. 2006. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing - Principle, Technology and Application. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1–2
Wright J, Ganesh A, Rao S and Ma Y. 2009. Robust principal component analysis: exact recovery of corrupted low-rank matrices via convex optimization//Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Vancouver, British Columbia: DBLP: 1–9
Xu Y, Wu Z B and Wei Z H. 2015. Spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral image based on low-rank decomposition. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 8(6): 2370–2380
Yuan Q Q, Zhang L P and Shen H F. 2012. Hyperspectral image denoising employing a spectral-spatial adaptive total variation model. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50(10): 3660–3677
张兵, 高连如. 2011. 高光谱图像分类与目标探测. 北京: 科学出版社: 52–55
Zhang B and Gao L Y. 2011. Hyperspectral Image Classification and Target Detection. Beijing: Science Press: 52–55
Zhang H Y, He W, Zhang L P, Shen H F and Yuan Q Q. 2014. Hyperspectral image restoration using low-rank matrix recovery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(8): 4729–4743
Zhao Y Q and Yang J X. 2015. Hyperspectral image denoising via sparse representation and low-rank constraint. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(1): 296–308
邹谋炎. 2001. 反卷积和信号复原. 北京: 国防工业出版社: 185–189
Zou M Y. 2001. Deconvolution and Signal Recovery. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press: 185–189
相关作者
相关机构