收稿：2017-02-16，
录用：2017-9-7，
纸质出版：2018-01
移动端阅览
受高光谱成像仪低空间分辨率及复杂地物的影响，高光谱遥感图像存在大量混合像元。为提高地表分类精度以及满足亚像元级目标探测的需求，混合像元分解技术一直是高光谱遥感研究热点之一。本文主要对高光谱混合像元分解技术中的核心问题：端元数目估计、端元提取算法、丰度估计算法进行综述，系统地分析了各种典型算法的原理及优缺点，进一步阐述研究过程中建立高精度遥感混合反演模型与遥感产品业务化中的混合像元分解技术难题，同时针对今后混合像元分解技术发展方向，指出在继续引入新型算法理论方法基础上，结合用户应用需求，推进高光谱混合像元分解算法业务化应用，为高光谱遥感工程化应用提供支持。
Hyperspectral imaging
which measures electromagnetic energy scattered in the instantaneous field view in hundreds of bands
contributes significantly to earth observation. As the electromagnetic spectrum covers visible
near infrared
and shortwave infrared spectral bands
it holds abundant spectral information. The subtle discriminative spectral characteristics also make material identification possible. However
the signals recorded by low-resolution hyperspectral sensors from certain pixels under a complex background are a mixture of substances. To improve the accuracy of classification and subpixel object detection
Hyperspectral Unmixing (HU) represents an important solution
especially in the remote sensing area. Mixed pixels comprise a few materials called endmembers. The fraction of each endmember in a pixel is called abundance. Given the hyperspectral data exhibiting high dimension
special spectral correlation
and huge quantity
the determination of the number of endmembers can be regarded as dimensionality reduction. The objective of HU is to estimate and extract the spectral signatures and abundance of endmembers. In this study
mixing models are systematically discussed. On the basis of mixing models
the core problem of HU is presented
which mainly comprises three aspects: estimation of number of endmembers
endmember extraction
and abundance fraction estimation. For each aspect
we summarize the basic theory and development of the HU processing methods. Through the basic theory model
this work performs an initial classification of each aspect. The physical or mathematical problems involved are also discussed along with classical and state-of-the-art methods used to address the problems. Furthermore
a general overview of each category is provided
and a comprehensive analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of classic algorithms is performed. Through the comparison of different methods
this study offers a perspective on the potential and emerging challenges in the process of HU. The research on HU has been continuous. Even though extensive processing results have been achieved and numerous analyses have been performed
obstacles remain and call for solutions. Five challenges are identified in this work: curse of dimensionality
establishment of a high-accuracy mixed inversion model
endmember variation
establishment of remote sensing operational product
and development of algorithms for real-time processing. According to each challenge
the study performs further analysis and presents several remarks. Then
suggestions with regard to future research directions are offered. This study provides a brief overview of HU. With the development of hyperspectral imaging
the performance of imaging data has undergone a qualitative leap. However
different application requires different data types. That is
the most suitable data
and not the data with the highest index
should be adopted to solve the problem. Considering the future development trend of HU
this work suggests that new methods be combined with the demands of users to promote the operational application of HU and support hyperspectral remote sensing engineering applications.
Akaike H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6): 716–723 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
Ambikapathi A M, Chan T H, Chi C Y and Keizer K. 2013. Hyperspectral data geometry-based estimation of number of endmembers using p-norm-based pure pixel identification algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51(5): 2753–2769 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2213261
Andreou C and Karathanassi V. 2014. Estimation of the number of endmembers using robust outlier detection method. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 7(1): 247–256 10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2260135
Araújo M C U, Saldanha T C B, Galvão R K H, Yoneyama T, Chame H C and Visani V. 2001. The successive projections algorithm for variable selection in spectroscopic multicomponent analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 57(2): 65–73 10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00119-8
Bajorski P. 2011. Second moment linear dimensionality as an alternative to virtual dimensionality. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 49(2): 672–678 10.1109/TGRS.2010.2057434
Bayliss J D, Gualtieri J A and Cromp R F. 1998. Analyzing hyperspectral data with independent component analysis//Proceedings of the SPIE Volume 3240, 26th AIPR Workshop: Exploiting New Image Sources and Sensors. Washington, DC: SPIE: 133–143 [DOI: 10.1117/12.300050]
Berman M, Kiiveri H, Lagerstrom R, Ernst A, Dunne R and Huntington J F. 2004. ICE: a statistical approach to identifying endmembers in hyperspectral images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(10): 2085–2095 10.1109/TGRS.2004.835299
Bioucas-Dias J M. 2009. A variable splitting augmented Lagrangian approach to linear spectral unmixing//Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing. Grenoble, France: IEEE: 1–4 [DOI: 10.1109/WHISPERS.2009.5289072]
Bioucas-Dias J M and Figueiredo M A T. 2010. Alternating direction algorithms for constrained sparse regression: application to hyperspectral unmixing//Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS). Reykjavik: IEEE: 1–4 [DOI: 10.1109/WHISPERS.2010.5594963]
Bioucas-Dias J M and Nascimento J M P. 2008. Hyperspectral subspace identification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46(8): 2435–2445 10.1109/TGRS.2008.918089
Bioucas-Dias J M, Plaza A, Camps-Valls G, Scheunders P, Nasrabadi N and Chanussot J. 2013. Hyperspectral remote sensing data analysis and future challenges. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 1(2): 6–36 10.1109/MGRS.2013.2244672
Bioucas-Dias J M, Plaza A, Dobigeon N, Parente M, Du Q, Gader P and Chanussot J. 2012. Hyperspectral unmixing overview: Geometrical, statistical, and sparse regression-based approaches. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 5(2): 354–379 10.1109/JSTARS.2012.2194696
Boardman J W. 1993. Automating spectral unmixing of AVIRIS data using convex geometry concepts//JPL, Summaries of the 4th Annual JPL Airborne Geoscience Workshop. Volume 1: AVIRIS Workshop. Boulder, CO: Colorado University: 11–14
Boardman J W, Kruse F A and Green R O. 1995. Mapping target signatures via partial unmixing of AVIRIS data//Summaries, 5th JPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop. Pasadena, CA: JPL Publication
Broadwater J, Chellappa R, Banerjee A and Burlina P. 2007. Kernel fully constrained least squares abundance estimates//Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Barcelona, Spain: IEEE: 4041–4044 [DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2007.4423736]
Chang C I and Du Q. 2004. Estimation of number of spectrally distinct signal sources in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(3): 608–619 10.1109/TGRS.2003.819189
陈晋, 马磊, 陈学泓, 饶玉晗. 2016. 混合像元分解技术及其进展. 遥感学报, 20(5): 1102–1109 10.11834/jrs.20166169
Chen J, Ma L, Chen X H and Rao Y H. 2016. Research progress of spectral mixture analysis. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(5): 1102–1109 (
Chen J, Richard C and Honeine P. 2014. Nonlinear estimation of material abundances in hyperspectral images with ℓ 1 norm spatial regularization. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(5): 2654–2665 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2264392
Chouzenoux E, Legendre M, Moussaoui S and Idier J. 2014. Fast constrained least squares spectral unmixing using primal-dual interior-point optimization. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 7(1): 59–69 10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2266732
Craig M D. 1994. Minimum-volume transforms for remotely sensed data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 32(3): 542–552 10.1109/36.297973
Dobigeon N, Moussaoui S, Tourneret J Y and Carteret C. 2009. Bayesian separation of spectral sources under non-negativity and full additivity constraints. Signal Processing, 89(12): 2657–2669 10.1016/j.sigpro.2009.05.005
杜培军, 夏俊士, 薛朝辉, 谭琨, 苏红军, 鲍蕊. 2016. 高光谱遥感影像分类研究进展. 遥感学报, 20(2): 236–256 10.11834/jrs.20165022
Du P J, Xia J S, Xue Z H, Tan K, Su H J and Bao R. 2016. Review of hyperspectral remote sensing image classification. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(2): 236–256 (
Eches O, Dobigeon N and Tourneret J Y. 2010. Estimating the number of endmembers in hyperspectral images using the normal compositional model and a hierarchical Bayesian algorithm. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 4(3): 582–591 10.1109/JSTSP.2009.2038212
Elad M and Aharon M. 2006. Image denoising via sparse and redundant representations over learned dictionaries. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 15(12): 3736–45 10.1109/TIP.2006.881969
Eismann M T and Stein D W J. 2007. Stochastic mixture modelling//Hyperspectral Data Exploitation: Theory and Applications. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley and Sons [DOI: 10.1002/9780470124628.ch5]
Farzam M, Beheshti S and Raahemifar K. 2008. Calculation of abundance factors in hyperspectral imaging using genetic algorithm//Proceedings of Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering. Niagara Falls, ON: IEEE: 837–842 [DOI: 10.1109/CCECE.2008.4564653]
Feng R Y, Zhong Y F and Zhang L P. 2015. An improved nonlocal sparse unmixing algorithm for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 12(4): 915–919 10.1109/LGRS.2014.2367028
Fuhrmann D R. 1999. Simplex shrink-wrap algorithm//Proceedings of the SPIE 3718, Automatic Target Recognition IX. Orlando, FL: SPIE [DOI: 10.1117/12.359990]
Fukunaga K. 1982. Intrinsic dimensionality extraction. Handbook of Statistics, 2: 347–360 10.1016/S0169-7161(82)02018-5
甘甫平, 熊盛青, 王润生, 闫柏琨. 2014. 高光谱矿物填图及示范应用. 北京: 科学出版社: 7
Gan F P, Xiong S Q, Wang R S and Yan B K. 2014. Hyperspectral mineral mapping and it’s demonstration applications. Beijing: Science Press: 7
Gao L R, Gao J W, Li J, Plaza A, Zhuang L N, Sun X and Zhang B. 2015. Multiple algorithm integration based on ant colony optimization for endmember extraction from hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 8(6): 2569–2582 10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2371615
Gao L R, Zhuang L N, Wu Y F, Sun X and Zhang B. 2016. A quantitative and comparative analysis of different preprocessing implementations of DPSO: a robust endmember extraction algorithm. Soft Computing, 20(12): 4669–4683 10.1007/s00500-014-1507-2
Gong P and Zhang A. 1999. Noise effect on linear spectral unmixing. Annals of GIS, 5(1): 52–57 10.1080/10824009909480514
Gonzalez C, Resano J, Plaza A and Mozos D. 2012. FPGA implementation of abundance estimation for spectral unmixing of hyperspectral data using the image space reconstruction algorithm. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 5(1): 248–261 10.1109/JSTARS.2011.2171673
Green A A, Berman M, Switzer P and Craig M D. 1988. A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 26(1): 65–74 10.1109/36.3001
Gruninger J H, Ratkowski A J and Hoke M L. 2004. The sequential maximum angle convex cone (SMACC) endmember model//Proceedings of the SPIE Volume 5425, Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery X. Orlando, FL: SPIE: 1–14 [DOI: 10.1117/12.543794]
Guilfoyle K J, Althouse M L and Chang C I. 2001. A quantitative and comparative analysis of linear and nonlinear spectral mixture models using radial basis function neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39(10): 2314–2318 10.1109/36.957296
Halimi A, Altmann Y, Dobigeon N and Tourneret J Y. 2011. Unmixing hyperspectral images using the generalized bilinear model // Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Vancouver, BC: IEEE: 1886–1889 [DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2011.6049492]
Harsanyi J C and Chang C I. 1994. Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: an orthogonal subspace projection approach. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 32(4): 779–785 10.1109/36.298007
Heinz D, Chang C I and Althouse M L G. 1999. Fully constrained least-squares based linear unmixing [hyperspectral image classification]//Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Hamburg, Germany: IEEE, 2: 1401–1403 [DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.1999.774644]
Heylen R, Parente M and Scheunders P. 2017. Estimation of the number of endmembers in a hyperspectral image via the hubness phenomenon. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(4): 2191–2200 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2638541
Jolliffe I T. 1986. Principal component analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986: 111–137 10.1007/978-1-4757-1904-8_7
Kizel F, Shoshany M, Netanyahu N S, Even-Tzur G and Benediktsson J A. 2017. A stepwise analytical projected gradient descent search for hyperspectral unmixing and its code vectorization. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(9): 4925–4943 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2692999
孔祥兵, 舒宁, 龚龑, 王凯. 2013. 结合空间和光谱信息的高光谱影像端元光谱自动提取. 光谱学与光谱分析, 33(6): 1647–1652 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2013)06-1647-06
Kong X B, Shu N, Gong Y and Wang K. 2013. Integration of spatial-spectral information based endmember extraction for hyperspectral image. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 33(6): 1647–1652 (
Lee C A, Gasster S D, Plaza A, Chang C I and Huang B. 2011. Recent developments in high performance computing for remote sensing: a review. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 4(3): 508–527 10.1109/JSTARS.2011.2162643
Li C, Ma Y, Huang J, Mei X G, Liu C Y and Ma J Y. 2016a. GBM-based unmixing of hyperspectral data using bound projected optimal gradient method. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 13(7): 952–956 10.1109/LGRS.2016.2555341
Li J. 2004. Wavelet-based feature extraction for improved endmember abundance estimation in linear unmixing of hyperspectral signals. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(3): 644–649 10.1109/TGRS.2003.822750
Li J and Bioucas-Dias J M. 2008. Minimum volume simplex analysis: a fast algorithm to unmix hyperspectral data//Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Boston, MA: IEEE: III-250-III-253 [DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2008.4779330]
Li J, Bioucas-Dias J M, Plaza A and Liu L. 2016b. Robust collaborative nonnegative matrix factorization for hyperspectral unmixing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(10): 6076–6090 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2580702
Luo B, Chanussot J, Douté S and Zhang L P. 2013. Empirical automatic estimation of the number of endmembers in hyperspectral images. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 10(1): 24–28 10.1109/LGRS.2012.2189934
Miao L D and Qi H. 2007. Endmember extraction from highly mixed data using minimum volume constrained nonnegative matrix factorization. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45(3): 765–777 10.1109/TGRS.2006.888466
Nascimento J M P and Bioucas-Dias J M. 2007. Hyperspectral unmixing algorithm via dependent component analysis//Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Barcelona, Spain: IEEE: 4033–4036 [DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2007.4423734]
Nascimento J M P and Dias J M B. 2005. Vertex component analysis: a fast algorithm to unmix hyperspectral data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(4): 898–910 10.1109/TGRS.2005.844293
Neville R A, Staenz K, Szeredi T, Lefebvre J and Hauff P. 1999. Automatic endmember extraction from hyperspectral data for mineral exploration//Proceedings of the Fourth International Air-borne Remote Sensing Conference and Exhibition/21st Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: ERIM International: 21–24
Plaza A, Martínez P, Pérez R and Plaza J. 2002. Spatial/spectral endmember extraction by multidimensional morphological operations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40(9): 2025–2041 10.1109/TGRS.2002.802494
Plaza J, Martínez P, Pérez R and Plaza A. 2004. Nonlinear neural network mixture models for fractional abundance estimation in AVIRIS hyperspectral images//Proceedings of the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory AVIRIS Airborne Earth Science Workshop. Pasadena, California: NASA
Qian Y T, Jia S, Zhou J and Robles-Kelly A. 2011. Hyperspectral unmixing via L 1/2 sparsity-constrained nonnegative matrix factorization. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 49(11): 4282–4297 10.1109/TGRS.2011.2144605
Qu Q, Nasrabadi N M and Tran T D. 2014. Abundance estimation for bilinear mixture models via joint sparse and low-rank representation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(7): 4404–4423 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2281981
Rissanen J. 1978. Modeling by shortest data description. Automatica, 14(5): 465–471 10.1016/0005-1098(78)90005-5
Rogge D M, Rivard B, Zhang J, Sanchez A, Harris J and Feng J. 2007. Integration of spatial–spectral information for the improved extraction of endmembers. Remote Sensing of Environment, 110(3): 287–303 10.1016/j.rse.2007.02.019
Rudin L I, Osher S and Fatemi E. 1992. Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 60(1/4): 259–268 10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-F
Schaepman M E, Ustin S L, Plaza A J, Painter T H, Verrelst J and Liang S L. 2009. Earth system science related imaging spectroscopy – an assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113 Suppl 1: S123-S137 10.1016/j.rse.2009.03.001
Song A, Chang A, Choi J, Choi S and Kim Y. 2015. Automatic extraction of optimal endmembers from airborne hyperspectral imagery using iterative error analysis (IEA) and spectral discrimination measurements. Sensors, 15, 2593–2613 10.3390/s150202593
利拉桑德, 基弗, 奇普曼著, 彭望琭, 余先川, 贺辉, 陈红顺译. 北京: 电子工业出版社: 382–400
Thomas M L, Ralph W K, Jonathan W C, Peng W L, Yu X C, He H and Chen H S. 2016. Remote sensing and image interpretation. Beijing: publishing house of electronics industry: 382–400
童庆禧, 张兵, 郑兰芬. 2006a. 高光谱遥感的多学科应用. 北京: 电子工业出版社: 18–22
Tong Q X, Zhang B and Zheng L F. 2006a. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing and It’s Multidisciplinary Applications. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry: 18–22
童庆禧, 张兵, 郑兰芬. 2006b. 高光谱遥感: 原理、技术与应用. 北京: 高等教育出版社: 38–42
Tong Q X, Zhang B and Zheng L F. 2006b. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing. Beijing: Higher Education Press: 38–42
汪国平, 杨可明, 卓伟, 夏天, 张文文. 2016. 高光谱影像端元数目估计的谐波分析假设检验模型. 科学技术与工程, 16(15): 98–105 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2016.15.016
Wang G P, Yang K M, Zhuo W, Xia T and Zhang W W. 2016. Harmonic analysis-hypothesis testing model on estimating the endmember numbers of hyperspectral image. Science Technology and Engineering, 16(15): 98–105 (
王润生, 熊盛青, 聂洪峰, 梁树能, 齐泽荣, 杨金中, 阎柏琨, 赵福岳, 范景辉, 童立强, 林键, 甘甫平, 陈微, 杨苏明, 张瑞江, 葛大庆, 张晓坤, 张振华, 王品清, 郭小方, 李丽. 2011. 遥感地质勘查技术与应用研究. 地质学报, 85(11): 1699–1743 11-1951/P.20111025.0854.009
Wang R S, Xiong S Q, Nie H F, Liang S N, Qi Z R, Yang J Z, Yan B K, Zhao F Y, Fan J H, Tong L Q, Lin J, Gan F P, Chen W, Yang S M, Zhang R J, Ge D Q, Zhang X K, Zhang Z H, Wang P Q, Gou X F and Li L. 2011. Remote sensing technology and its application in geological exploration. Acta Geologica Sinica, 85(11): 1699–1743 (
Winter M E. 1999. N-FINDR: an algorithm for fast autonomous spectral end-member determination in hyperspectral data//Proceedings of the SPIE Volume 3753, Imaging Spectrometry V. Denver, CO: SPIE [DOI: 10.1117/12.366289]
吴波, 张良培, 李平湘. 2004. 非监督正交子空间投影的高光谱混合像元自动分解. 中国图象图形学报, 9(11): 1392–1396 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8961.2004.11.020
Wu B, Zhang L P and Li P X. 2004. Unsupervised orthogonal subspace projection approach to unmix hyperspectral imagery automatically. Journal of Image and Graphics, 9(11): 1392–1396 (
吴波, 张良培, 李平湘. 2006. 基于支撑向量回归的高光谱混合像元非线性分解. 遥感学报, 10(3): 312–318 10.11834/jrs.20060348
Wu B, Zhang L P and Li P X. 2006. Unmixing hyperspectral imagery based on support vector nonlinear approximating regression. Journal of Remote Sensing, 10(3): 312–318 (
吴见, 彭道黎. 2011. 高光谱遥感林业信息提取技术研究进展. 光谱学与光谱分析, 31(9): 2305–2312
Wu J and Peng D L. 2011. Advances in researches on hyperspectral remote sensing forestry information-extracting technology. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 31(9): 2305–2312 (
杨可明, 刘二雄, 张婉婉, 汪国平, 夏天. 2016. 基于SURF和顾及维数的高光谱影像端元提取新算法. 科学技术与工程, 16(18): 66–71 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2016.18.012
Yang K M, Liu E X, Zhang W W, Wang G P and Xia T. 2016. A novel algorithm on endmember extraction based on surf and considering the dimension of hyperspectral image. Science Technology and Engineering, 16(18): 66–71 (
Yokoya N, Chanussot J and Iwasaki A. 2014. Nonlinear unmixing of hyperspectral data using semi-nonnegative matrix factorization. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(2): 1430–1437 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2251349
Zare A and Gader P. 2007. Sparsity promoting iterated constrained endmember detection in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 4(3): 446–450 10.1109/LGRS.2007.895727
张兵. 2011. 智能遥感卫星系统. 遥感学报, 15(3): 415–431 10.11834/jrs.20110354
Zhang B. 2011. Intelligent remote sensing satellite system. Journal of Remote Sensing, 15(3): 415–431 (
张达, 郑玉权. 2013. 高光谱遥感的发展与应用. 光学与光电技术, 11(3): 67–73
Zhang D and Zheng Y Q. 2013. Hyperspectral remote sensing and its development and application review. Optics and Optoelectronic Technology, 11(3): 67–73 (
Zhang S Q, Li J, Liu K, Deng C Z, Liu L and Plaza A. 2016. Hyperspectral unmixing based on local collaborative sparse regression. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 13(5): 631–635 10.1109/LGRS.2016.2527782
Zhao H H, Jiang Y M, Wang T, Cui W H and Li X W. 2016. A method based on the adaptive cuckoo search algorithm for endmember extraction from hyperspectral remote sensing images. Remote Sensing Letters, 7(3): 289–297 10.1080/2150704X.2015.1134844
赵少华, 张峰, 王桥, 姚云军, 王中挺, 游代安. 2013. 高光谱遥感技术在国家环保领域中的应用. 光谱学与光谱分析, 33(12): 3343–3348 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2013)12-3343-06
Zhao S H, Zhang F, Wang Q, Yao Y J, Wang Z T and You D A. 2013. Application of hyper-spectral remote sensing technology in environmental protection. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 33(12): 3343–3348 (
Zheng C Y, Li H, Wang Q and Philip Chen C L. 2016. Reweighted sparse regression for hyperspectral unmixing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(1): 479–488 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2459763
Zortea M and Plaza A. 2009. Spatial preprocessing for endmember extraction. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 47(8): 2679–2693 10.1109/TGRS.2009.2014945
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621
