FY-3B/MWRI和Aqua/AMSR-E海冰密集度比较及印证
Comparison and validation of sea ice concentration from FY-3B/MWRI and Aqua/AMSR-E observations
- 2018年22卷第5期 页码:723-736
纸质出版日期: 2018-9 ,
录用日期: 2018-3-23
DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20187419
扫 描 看 全 文
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
纸质出版日期: 2018-9 ,
录用日期: 2018-3-23
扫 描 看 全 文
王晓雨, 管磊, 李乐乐. 2018. FY-3B/MWRI和Aqua/AMSR-E海冰密集度比较及印证. 遥感学报, 22(5): 723–736
Wang X Y, Guan L and Li L L. 2018. Comparison and validation of sea ice concentration from FY-3B/MWRI and Aqua/AMSR-E observations. Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(5): 723–736
本文对2011-07-01—2011-09-30风云三号B星(FY-3B)搭载的微波成像仪MWRI(Microwave Radiometer Imager)和Aqua卫星搭载的微波扫描辐射计AMSR-E(Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for Earth Observing System)观测数据获取的海冰密集度产品进行比较及印证。首先,逐日比较FY-3B/MWRI和Aqua/AMSR-E区域平均海冰密集度;其次,逐月比较FY-3B/MWRI和Aqua/AMSR-E月平均海冰密集度;最后,使用Aqua卫星搭载的中等分辨率成像光谱辐射计MODIS数据进行印证。MWRI和AMSR-E比较结果为(1)MWRI与AMSR-E逐日区域平均海冰密集度变化趋势一致,MWRI海冰密集度均高于AMSR-E,7—9月MWRI与AMSR-E逐日平均偏差月平均值分别为8.55%、7.67%、2.58%,逐日标准差月平均值分别为12.16%、12.08%、10.43%,二者差异逐月减小。(2)MWRI与AMSR-E月平均海冰密集度差呈现逐月递减趋势,7—9月MWRI与AMSR-E逐月平均偏差分别为7.37%、6.53%、1.51%,逐月标准差分别为4.61%、4.36%、3.64%,MWRI与AMSR-E差异逐月减小的原因是二者在密集度较低的边缘区域差异较大,而夏季随着边缘区域海冰的融化,二者差异逐渐减小。MWRI和AMSR-E海冰密集度与MODIS印证结果为:(1)密集度小于95%情况下,MWRI与AMSR-E海冰密集度均比MODIS偏高,AMSR-E更接近MODIS,MWRI高估,误差较大。(2)密集度大于等于95%情况下,MWRI与AMSR-E海冰密集度均比MODIS偏低,AMSR-E偏低更多,MWRI结果更好。
Sea ice concentration
which refers to the percentage of sea ice in an area
is one of the important parameters describing the characteristics of sea ice. Remote sensing monitoring of Arctic sea ice is crucial for understanding the role of the Arctic in the global climate system and in global warming. Therefore
comparing and evaluating the products of sea ice data retrieved from different satellite observations are necessary. In addition
assessing the accuracy of sea ice distribution from satellite observations is significant in studies on climate change and global warming because the extrapolation of global surface energy flows is very sensitive to the estimation of Arctic sea ice cover. To evaluate sea ice concentration from the Microwave Radiometer Imager (MWRI) onboard the FY-3B satellite
we compare the data products with the sea ice concentration from the advanced microwave scanning radiometer for earth observing system (AMSR-E) onboard the Aqua satellite. High-resolution moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) data are used to validate MWRI and AMSR-E sea ice concentration. The comparison of MWRI and AMSR-E incudes daily and monthly data. MODIS L1B band 2 channel reflectance is chosen to validate the sea ice concentration of MWRI and AMSR-E. The processing procedure of MODIS mainly consists of solar zenith correction
radiometric calibration
removing bow-tie phenomenon
and map projection. The map projection is the polar stereographic projection
which is the same as the MWRI and AMSR-E products. To avoid the misjudgment of ice and water because of the cloud influence
we choose cloudfree MODIS channel 2 sub-region for ice and water recognition. Different thresholds according to the histogram of the reflectance are used to segment the ice and water pixels. The MODIS sea ice concentration in each MWRI and AMSR-E grid is calculated. The comparison results of MWRI and AMSR-E are as follows. First
MWRI and AMSR-E daily mean sea ice concentrations show a consistent change from July to September
and MWRI sea ice concentration is higher than AMSR-E each day. The monthly mean values of daily biases for July
August
and September are 8.55%
7.67%
and 2.58%
and the monthly mean of daily standard deviations are 12.16%
12.08%
and 10.43%
respectively. Second
from July to September
the monthly sea ice concentration difference between MWRI and AMSR-E (MWRI minus AMSR-E) shows a decreasing trend. The monthly biases for July
August
and September are 7.37%
6.53%
and 1.51%
and the monthly standard deviations are 4.61%
4.36%
and 3.64%
respectively. The validation results of MWRI and AMSR-E sea ice concentration with MODIS are as follows. First
in the region of MODIS sea ice concentration less than 95%
the sea ice concentration difference between MWRI and MODIS (MWRI minus MODIS) is 9.78%±16.90%
and the difference between AMSR-E and MODIS (AMSR-E minus MODIS) is 0.90%±13.09%. MWRI and AMSR-E tend to overestimate sea ice concentration compared with MODIS
the result of AMSR-E is closer to MODIS
and MWRI has a larger error. Second
when MODIS sea ice concentration is greater than or equal to 95%
the sea ice concentration difference between MWRI and MODIS is –5.45%±7.05%
and the difference between AMSR-E and MODIS is –7.97%±6.46%. MWRI and AMSR-E tend to underestimate sea ice concentration compared with MODIS
and the result of MWRI is slightly better.
海冰密集度FY-3B/MWRIAqua/AMSR-E比较印证MODIS冰水识别
sea ice concentrationFY-3B/MWRIAqua/AMSR-EcomparisonvalidationMODISice and water recognition
Barry R G, Serreze M C, Maslanik J A and Preller R H. 1993. The Arctic sea ice-climate system: observations and modeling. Reviews of Geophysics, 31(4): 397–422
Belchansky G I and Douglas D C. 2002. Seasonal comparisons of sea ice concentration estimates derived from SSM/I, OKEAN, and RADARSAT data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 81(1): 67–81
Cavalieri D J, Markus T, Hall D K, Gasiewski A J, Klein M and Ivanoff A. 2006. Assessment of EOS Aqua AMSR-E Arctic sea ice concentrations using Landsat-7 and airborne microwave imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(11): 3057–3069
Cavalieri D J, Markus T, Hall D K, Ivanoff A and Glick E. 2010. Assessment of AMSR-E Antarctic winter sea-ice concentrations using Aqua MODIS. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48(9): 3331–3339
Comiso J C, Cavalieri D J and Markus T. 2003. Sea ice concentration, ice temperature, and snow depth using AMSR-E data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(2): 243–252
Hao G H and Su J. 2015. A study on the dynamic tie points ASI algorithm in the Arctic ocean. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 34(11): 126–135
Heinrichs J F, Cavalieri D J and Markus T. 2006. Assessment of the AMSR-E sea ice-concentration product at the ice edge using RADARSAT-1 and MODIS imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(11): 3070–3080
Karvonen J. 2017. Baltic sea ice concentration estimation using SENTINEL-1 SAR and AMSR2 microwave radiometer data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(5): 2871–2883
Maaß N, Kaleschke L, Tian-Kunze X and Drusch M. 2013. Snow thickness retrieval over thick Arctic sea ice using SMOS satellite data. Cryosphere, 7(6): 1971–1989
Meier W N, Hovelsrud G K, van Oort B E H, Key J R, Kovacs K M, Michel C, Haas C, Granskog M A, Gerland S, Perovich D K, Makshtas A and Reist J D. 2014. Arctic sea ice in transformation: a review of recent observed changes and impacts on biology and human activity. Reviews of Geophysics, 52(3): 185–217
Peng G and Meier W N. 2017. Temporal and regional variability of Arctic sea-ice coverage from satellite data. Annals of Glaciology: 1–10
Rind D, Healy R, Parkinson C and Martinson D. 1995. The role of seaice in 2×CO2 climate model sensitivity. Part I: the total influence of sea ice thickness and extent. Journal of Climate, 8(3): 449–463
Spreen G, Kaleschke L and Heygster G. 2008. Sea ice remote sensing using AMSR-E 89-GHz channels. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 113(C2): C02S03
苏洁, 郝光华, 叶鑫欣, 王维波. 2013. 极区海冰密集度AMSR-E数据反演算法的试验与验证. 遥感学报, 17(3): 495–513
Su J, Hao G H, Ye X X and Wang W B. 2013. The experiment and validation of sea ice concentration AMSR-E retrieval algorithm in polar region. Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(3): 495–513 (
席颖, 孙波, 李鑫. 2013. 利用船测数据以及Landsat-7 ETM+影像评估南极海冰区AMSR-E海冰密集度. 遥感学报, 17(3): 514–526
Xi Y, Sun B and Li X. 2013. Assessment of AMSR-E ASI sea ice concentration using ship observations and Landsat-7 ETM+ imagery. Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(3): 514–526 (
赵杰臣, 周翔, 孙晓宇, 程净净, 胡波, 李春花. 2017. 北极遥感海冰密集度数据的比较和评估. 遥感学报, 21(3): 351–364
Zhao J C, Zhou X, Sun X Y, Cheng J J, Hu B and Li C H. 2017. The inter comparison and assessment of satellite sea-ice concentration datasets from the arctic. Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(3): 351–364 (
相关作者
相关机构