海洋激光雷达反演水体光学参数
Retrieval of seawater optical properties with an oceanic lidar
- 2019年23卷第5期 页码:944-951
纸质出版日期: 2019-9 ,
录用日期: 2018-12-13
DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20198354
扫 描 看 全 文
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
纸质出版日期: 2019-9 ,
录用日期: 2018-12-13
扫 描 看 全 文
刘志鹏, 刘东, 徐沛拓, 吴兰, 周雨迪, 韩冰, 刘群, 宋庆君, 毛志华, 张与鹏, 崔晓宇, 陈鹏. 2019. 海洋激光雷达反演水体光学参数. 遥感学报, 23(5): 944–951
Liu Z P, Liu D, Xu P T, Wu L, Zhou Y D, Han B, Liu Q, Song Q J, Mao Z H, Zhang Y P, Cui X Y and Chen P. 2019. Retrieval of seawater optical properties with an oceanic lidar. Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(5): 944–951
研制了一套船载海洋激光雷达,用于探测海水光学参数垂直廓线。2017年8月,该系统在黄海海域进行了实验测量。在准单次散射模型中引入原位测量的光学参数,实现了理想激光雷达回波信号的模拟,并将该理想信号与系统响应函数卷积后精确复现了实验的激光雷达信号。采用Fernald后向迭代积分法(简称Fernald法),比较了不同水体悬浮物激光雷达比下反演的激光雷达衰减系数
α
与原位漫射衰减系数
K
d
的差别。基于停航时标定的水体悬浮物激光雷达比,采用Fernald法获得了走航时的激光雷达衰减系数。进一步地,提出一种基于米散射激光雷达数据和原位测量的后向散射数据的融合算法,模拟了高光谱分辨率激光雷达(HSRL)反演
α
的过程,并将其与Fernald法进行了比较。实验结果表明,自研的海洋激光雷达能够有效探测海水光学参数,基于合适的水体悬浮物激光雷达比的Fernald法可以有效应用于米散射激光雷达的反演,未来无需假设的HSRL在海水光学参数探测领域具有更大的优势。
Studying seawater optical properties is of great importance in global climate change and material cycle. lidar has the ability to retrieve the profiles of seawater’s optical properties. A single-scattering lidar equation is typically a useful and effective model of lidar return. However
lidar return depends on the volume scattering function at 180° scattering angle and lidar attenuation coefficient
which makes retrieval from an equation difficult. The Fernald method is often used to retrieve backscatter lidar return with the assumption of lidar ratio. High Spectral Resolution Lidar (HSRL) can retrieve optical properties without assumption. A shipborne traditional lidar was developed to detect the vertical profile of seawater optical parameters. Experiments on seawater were conducted in the nearshore and offshore regions of the Yellow Sea. The lidar system was fixed on the front deck of a scientific survey boat. In situ optical measurements were also performed in the two regions. A simple quasi-single-scattering approximation was employed to calculate a modeled lidar return with inherent optical properties derived from the in situ measurement. The comparison of oceanographic lidar returns with modeled lidar returns using nearly coincident in situ optical properties were in perfect agreement with the nearshore and offshore regions
indicating that lidar can effectively detect seawater optical parameters. The difference between the inverse lidar attenuation coefficient and the in situ diffusion attenuation coefficient were analyzed based on the Fernald method with different lidar ratios. With the use of the calibrated lidar ratio
the lidar attenuation coefficients while sailing were obtained by using the Fernald method. A fusion algorithm based on traditional lidar data and in situ backscatter coefficient was also proposed to simulate HSRL. Then the accuracies of the Fernald method and fusion algorithm were compared. In the nearshore water column
diffuse attenuation coefficient varied from 0.15 m
−1
to 0.28 m
−1
and the maximum error of both methods was below 11%. As for the offshore water column
diffuse attenuation coefficients changed little through depths
approximately 0.1 m
−1
to 0.16 m
−1
. The maximum error of the two methods was nearly 17%. The statistical analysis showed that diffuse attenuation coefficient can be well employed both by fusion algorithm and the Fernald method (with calibrated lidar ratio). This paper described the applications of lidar for profiling the properties of upper ocean. To overcome the assumption of lidar ratio in the future while retrieving water column information from traditional lidar
the HSRL without assumption has a great advantage in the field of seawater optical parameter detection.
遥感海洋光学光学遥感激光雷达漫射衰减系数激光雷达衰减系数
remote sensingocean opticsoptical remote sensinglidardiffuse attenuation coefficientlidar attenuation coefficient
Behrenfeld M J and Boss E. 2006. Beam attenuation and chlorophyll concentration as alternative optical indices of phytoplankton biomass. Journal of Marine Research, 64(3): 431–451
Churnside J H. 2015. Bio-optical model to describe remote sensing signals from a stratified ocean. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 9(1): 095989
Dickey T, Lewis M and Chang G. 2006. Optical oceanography: recent advances and future directions using global remote sensing and in situ observations. Reviews of Geophysics, 44(1): RG1001
Fernald F G. 1984. Analysis of atmospheric lidar observations: some comments. Applied Optics, 23(5): 652–653
Gordon H R. 1982. Interpretation of airborne oceanic lidar: effects of multiple scattering. Applied Optics, 21(16): 2996–3001
Lee J H, Churnside J H, Marchbanks R D, Donaghay P L and Sullivan J M. 2013. Oceanographic lidar profiles compared with estimates from in situ optical measurements. Applied Optics, 52(4): 786–794
Vasilkov A P, Goldin Y A, Gureev B A, Hoge F E, Swift R N and Wright C W. 2001. Airborne polarized lidar detection of scattering layers in the ocean. Applied Optics, 40(24): 4353–4364
徐沛拓, 刘东, 周雨迪, 刘群, 白剑, 刘志鹏, 吴兰, 沈亦兵, 刘崇. 2019. 海洋激光雷达多次散射回波信号建模与分析. 遥感学报待刊
Xu P T, Liu D, Zhou Y D, Liu Q, Bai J, Liu Z P, Wu L, Shen Y B and Liu C. 2019. Modeling and analyzing of oceanic lidar returns with multiple scattering. Journal of Remote Sensing
Zhou Y D, Liu D, Xu P T, Liu C, Bai J, Yang L M, Cheng Z T, Tang P J, Zhang Y P and Su L. 2017. Retrieving the seawater volume scattering function at the 180° scattering angle with a high-spectral-resolution lidar. Optics Express, 25(10): 11813–11826
周雨迪, 刘东, 徐沛拓, 毛志华, 陈鹏, 刘志鹏, 刘群, 唐培钧, 张与鹏, 王雪霁, 任佳炜, 金时伟. 2019. 偏振激光雷达探测大气-水体光学参数廓线. 遥感学报, 23(1): 108–115
Zhou Y D, Liu D, Xu P T, Mao Z H, Chen P, Liu Z P, Liu Q, Tang P J, Zhang Y P, Wang X J, Ren J W and Jin S W. 2019. Detecting atmospheric-water optical property profiles with a polarized lidar. Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(1): 108–115
相关作者
相关机构