海洋激光雷达多次散射回波信号建模与分析
Modeling and analysis of oceanic lidar returns with multiple scattering
- 2020年24卷第2期 页码:142-148
纸质出版日期: 2020-02-07
DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20208266
扫 描 看 全 文
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
纸质出版日期: 2020-02-07 ,
扫 描 看 全 文
徐沛拓,刘东,周雨迪,刘群,白剑,刘志鹏,吴兰,沈亦兵,刘崇.2020.海洋激光雷达多次散射回波信号建模与分析.遥感学报,24(2): 142-148Xu P T,Liu D,Zhou Y D,Liu Q,Bai J,Liu Z P,Wu L,Shen Y B and Liu C. 2020. Modeling and analysis of oceanic lidar returns with multiple scattering. Journal of Remote Sensing(Chinese), 24(2): 142-148[DOI:10.11834/jrs.20208266]
XU Peituo,LIU Dong,ZHOU Yudi,LIU Qun,BAI Jian,LIU Zhipeng,WU Lan,SHEN Yibing,LIU Chong. 2020. Modeling and analysis of oceanic lidar returns with multiple scattering. National Remote Sensing Bulletin. 24(2): 142-148
海洋激光雷达是实现上层海水3维探测的重要工具,激光在海水中的传输伴随着复杂的多次散射效应,建立准确的海洋激光雷达多次散射回波信号模型有助于实现海水光学特性的高精度反演。本文介绍了仿真海洋激光雷达多次散射信号的解析模型、半解析 MC(Monte Carlo)仿真方法和传统MC仿真方法,定量对比分析了不同工作条件下3种模型的仿真结果,讨论了工作高度、接收视场角、水质和水体分层等因素对仿真结果的影响。研究表明:3种模型具有高度一致的仿真结果,但在计算效率方面,解析模型优于半解析MC法,半解析MC法优于传统MC法。解析模型优异的计算效率和可靠的计算精度使其在海洋激光雷达辐射传递机理及应用的研究中具有显著优势。
Oceanic lidar is a powerful tool that can detect the depth-resolved profiles of the upper ocean water. Seawater optical properties are usually retrieved according to the single scattering lidar equation. However
the accuracy of the simplified equation cannot be guaranteed because of the multiple light scattering in the ocean
which calls for an accurate and effective lidar return model. The accuracy of Monte Carlo (MC) simulation gains recognition because of few assumptions. However
MC simulation is limited by its low efficiency. The computation cost in the analytical model decreases. This phenomenon has not been verified in the oceanic lidar. Therefore
evaluating the accuracy of the analytical model is essential.
The principles of the analytical model
conventional MC simulation
and semi-analytic MC simulation were introduced. The analytical model generally depended on the quasi-small-angle approximation. Under such approximation
the radiative transfer equation was solved in the Fourier space using the small angle approximation
which reduced the complexity of the calculation. The conventional MC simulation is based on the purely stochastic construction of an ensemble of photon trajectories through the medium of interest. The semi-analytic approach is used to reduce the statistical error of the conventional MC simulation by combining stochastic and analytic techniques.
The effects of operating parameters
such as the height
field of view
water types
and distribution of phytoplankton layers
on the lidar signals were analyzed and compared. The results showed that the analytical model agrees well with the MC simulation in the homogenous and stratified water. However
in terms of the calculation efficiency
the semi-analytic MC is faster than the conventional MC
and the analytical model is faster than semi-analytic MC. As a result
high accuracy and remarkable efficiency make the analytical model superior in the simulation of the oceanic lidar return.
Methods for simulating oceanic lidar signals
including the analytical model
conventional MC simulation
and semi-analytic MC simulation
were introduced in this paper. Simulations based on these methods were performed under different operating parameters and demonstrated the high accuracy and remarkable efficiency of the analytical model. These advantages make the analytical model superior in the simulation of the oceanic lidar return. The physical mechanism of laser propagation in the water and retrieval of optical parameters based on oceanic lidar will be the prospective objectives based on the method and result in this work.
光学遥感激光雷达多次散射解析模型Monte Carlo(MC)仿真
optical remote sensinglidarmultiple scatteringanalytical modelMonte Carlo simulation
Bissonnette L R, Roy G, Poutier L, Cober S G and Isaac G A. 2002. Multiple-scattering lidar retrieval method: tests on Monte Carlo simulations and comparisons within situmeasurements. Applied Optics, 41(30): 6307-6324 [DOI: 10.1364/AO.41.006307http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.41.006307]
Bravo-Zhivotovskiy D M, Dolin L S, Luchinin A G and Savel’yev V A. 1969. Structure of a narrow light beam in sea water. Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, 5: 160-167
Gordon H R. 1982. Interpretation of airborne oceanic lidar: effects of multiple scattering. Applied Optics, 21(16): 2996-3001 [DOI: 10.1364/AO.21.002996http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.21.002996]
Katsev I L, Zege E P, Prikhach A S and Polonsky I N. 1997. Efficient technique to determine backscattered light power for various atmospheric and oceanic sounding and imaging systems. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 14(6): 1338-1346 [DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.14.001338http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.14.001338]
Mobley C D 1994. Light and Water: Radiative Transfer in Natural Waters. San Diego: Academic Press: 74-135
Petzold T J. 1972. Volume Scattering Functions for Selected Ocean Waters. Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Plass G N and Kattawar G W. 1971. Reflection of light pulses from clouds. Applied Optics, 10(10): 2304-2310 [DOI: 10.1364/AO.10.002304http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.10.002304]
Poole L R, Venable D D and Campbell J W. 1981. Semianalytic Monte Carlo radiative transfer model for oceanographic lidar systems. Applied Optics, 20(20): 3653-3656 [DOI: 10.1364/AO.20.003653http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.20.003653]
Zhou Y D, Liu D, Xu P T, Liu C, Bai J, Yang L M, Cheng Z T, Tang P J, Zhang Y P and Su L. 2017. Retrieving the seawater volume scattering function at the 180° scattering angle with a high-spectral-resolution lidar. Optics Express, 25(10): 11813-11826 [DOI: 10.1364/OE.25.011813http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.011813]
Zhou Y D, Liu D, Xu P T, Mao Z H, Chen P, Liu Z P, Liu Q, Tang P J, Zhang Y P, Wang X J, Ren J W and Jin S W. 2019. Detecting atmospheric-water optical property profiles with a polarized lidar. Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(1): 108-115
周雨迪, 刘东, 徐沛拓, 毛志华, 陈鹏, 刘志鹏, 刘群, 唐培钧, 张与鹏, 王雪霁, 任佳炜, 金时伟. 2019. 偏振激光雷达探测大气—水体光学参数廓线. 遥感学报, 23(1): 108-115 [DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20197535http://dx.doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20197535]
相关作者
相关机构